14 July 2019

Ridin' But Walkin'




Remember those far-off days when music was either good or bad? Well, here's a track which undoubtedly falls into the "good" category. I first came across it on a Jack Teagarden compilation (above) in my local library, and ever since then have assumed - without actually bothering to investigate to any great degree - that any RCA LP in their "vintage" series with the distinctive winerack cover must perforce contain any number of equivalent goodies.




One of the consequences of the digital age generally is that although you get more sides for your buck - those who still part with bucks, that is - the sense that some kindly mentor has cherrypicked the best of an artist for you has all but gone. What, he recorded eight takes that day? Here they all are - and two you never knew about. (You're welcome.) And hey, don't let The Man at Decca decide what constitutes the best of early Duke Ellington - here's a boxful of the stuff; now you can fill your blue serge boots.

Such largesse can be a mixed blessing, leading to the aural equivalent of a psychomatic affliction  termed "sightseer's ankle" by Robert Robinson. When in an art gallery chocka with masterpieces Robinson's sense of the enormity of the artist's achievement, the sheer cliff face that he, the viewer, was now being asked to scale unaided, made enjoyment and engagement impossible to sustain for more than about ten minutes, whereupon that ache would conveniently kick in, excusing him from further labour. So I mourn those LP covers with essays by Brian Rust, gently guiding you to an appreciation of the carefully selected contents.

In the case of that Teagarden album the essayist is actually jazz historian Richard B Hadlock, but the point still stands. I haven't sought out the album since then, though it covered quite a range of his work, as I remember. Songs like I'll Be a Friend With Pleasure by Ben Pollack (catchphrase: "May it please you") sounded sentimental, possibly ironic, though not unpleasant, and Never Had a Reason to Believe in You by the Mound City Blue Blowers was good fun, but it was Ridin' But Walkin', credited to Fats Waller and His Buddies, which really caught the ear. In a sense it doesn't amount to much: a simple blues. But there are several things in its favour. One is that in addition to Teagarden it features Fats Waller, albeit in an unusually restrained mode, leaning back and content to be a sideman, helping things along. The other is that members of Luis Russell's Orchestra (though not Russell himself) are featured - musicians I had already come to know and love though another LP discovered in that library featuring the very best of Russell's output, which is saying plenty.

It must also be said that the sound on the above youtube clip is better than can be heard on the relevant volume of JSP's Complete Fats Waller set. Although the hallowed John R.T. Davies more or less annointed Ted Kendall as his successor, to my ears Kendall's transfer of Ridin' But Walkin' has a trace of that sadly familiar underwater sound (spillage from the River of Jordan?) which attends over-processing. So I wonder about the source material uploaded to youtube: might it have been from that vinyl Teagarden compilation? It would be nice to think so.


Those old jazz albums which filled the record racks in my local library have been on my mind in recent days as I have been leafing through a first edition of The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Jazz (above) by Brian Case and Stan Britt. "First edition" shouldn't be taken to imply anything particularly collectable or valuable to anyone else in this instance; it's just that it's likely to contain more of the album covers I recognise from the years of frequenting my local library than later editions: "illustrated by ... 275 record jackets" is the book's boast, and I think I must have skimmed through most of them.

The quality of the covers varies, though often the basis is an old photograph of the artist or band put, with a great or lesser degree of artistry, into some setting intended to be visually arresting. When a painting or drawing has removed the need for a photograph of the artist the cover is more likely to have aged well; there are many cases where you feel like trying to prise a photo away from some once-trendy setting. One Jelly Roll Morton album was adorned by a strange, mysterious misty shape, presumably intended to bolster the legend of the man who claimed to have invented jazz.


Later on I bought my own copy of the album with the rather more prosaic cover which you can see below. But that Impressionist painting seemed to match the strangeness, to me, of the tracks: something which couldn't quite be grasped, however simple and spare the playing and singing.


Yet all the covers I thumbed through in those long-ago days, good or bad as they may now seem, spoke of excitements contained inside which were different in some unspecified way from those promised by pop and rock albums. They seemed, these jazz people, sophisticated and adult by comparison - and their work was stored in a library, which meant they were educational, not for fun - or not just for fun. I suppose I treated some of these records as a kind of nasty medicine which I'd be wise to persist in taking even if the rewards were less immediate than pop. And I recall that on one occasion in the early seventies I got respect at the post office counter when the assistant saw I was carrying the library's copy of The Luis Russell Story, so that was a considerable payoff. No, we didn't then proceed to form a band together, but it was certainly a moment.

I can't claim, however, that I gave myself wholeheartedly to this new interest and immediately began working through all the library had to offer in that wideranging category. Listening to a cassette of Charlie Christian at Minton's I had a sense that that was about my limit: it was enjoyable, or enjoyable-ish, but Louis Armstrong and Clarence Williams and others were preferable. Given my liking for Luis Russell I suppose I ought to have listened more methodically to the library's Duke Ellington LPs, but I didn't. 


Certain album covers, like the above for Ellington and Johnny Hodges, stick in my mind but I never actually borrowed it, as far as I recall. Too busy buying doo wop and rock'n'roll records, probably, and riffling through the library's stock of nostalgiac records of variety stars and Vivian Ellis musicals, so I never really had the singlemindedness of some jazz devotees. And there was further diversion to be found in the library in nearby Hamilton, which I discovered was more liberal in its purchasing of vinyl - it had, for example, The Cameo-Parkway Story: The London American Legend, not to mention Neil Sedaka - so I wasn't driven deeper into jazz, and to this day have never really explored much beyond the mid-forties.




When I look at the many album covers in that book, some of which can be seen on its back cover (above), I feel a sense of warmth, and a  wistfulness about the past which they conjure up - my past, I mean, not 1920s New Orleans or Kansas City. It's not that I want to go back there - it certainly wasn't uniformly agreeable - but libraries have always been substantial things in my life, havens, ways of accessing wonders. It's a long time since I have walked into the building which introduced me to jazz, and it may be that I shall never go back again. The odd comment I have read on online forums suggests it is quite a different beast now: a sleepy reference room now seems to be cluttered with computers and much arguing about who is entitled to use the machines and when, if those online critics are to be believed.

The library's jazz collection was already beginning to change and shrink before I moved from the area; at some point pop was deemed to be okay which I think coincided with the introduction of charges for the privilege of borrowing records. Perhaps the message was: "You can listen to this trash but let's not pretend it'll do you any good." Jazz records deemed surplus to requirements were sold off on occasion: I bought Clarence Williams Rarities, which I had borrowed and listened to countless times. It has an unlovely cover, expressly aimed at the afficionado who already knew what he was getting - no need for an image of Williams or his accomplices against a psychedelic background. I just missed the copy of The Luis Russell Story which had been such a joyful discovery to my fourteen year old self; I did think of remonstrating with the middle-aged man who had snatched it up, but I didn't.

There is unlikely, then, to be a pile of jazz albums mouldering and gently warping in some dusty basement room in my former local library: all, I imagine, must now been sold off at bargain prices. Perhaps some of those who snapped them up did so to revisit the hours of pleasure the LPs and their covers had already afforded them. I do hope that Luis Russell went to a good home. Ditto Jugs and Washboards, a Decca compilation with Clarence Williams sides, doubtless also gone into the void; I picked up another copy, at a price, some years later in London. "Hens' teeth" was the sign directing me to towards it.

I wonder about the fate of that Jack Teagarden album containing the Fats Waller gem. Assuming it hasn't already gone to landfill - a much-played library copy can't be worth a lot, after all - will there come a time, in this unexpected age of vinyl revival, when someone's grandson chances to place a slightly wavy disc on his top of the range turntable or his cheap and nasty all-in-one with USB output, grimaces through the simpering of Ben Pollack and is about to lift the record off when he hears the opening of Ridin' But Walkin' and wonders where it has been all his life?

Libraries have to adapt, and even if I could I wouldn't want to halt the selling-off of that once-loved stock if it's no longer in demand - though it would certainly be nice to get there five minutes earlier on the day of the sale, thus allowing me to clasp The Luis Russell Story to my own bosom, cackling horribly at the sight of my thwarted rival's tears of frustration.

But that sense of triumph would, I imagine, be short-lived. Because what I'd really like - what I need -  is the chance to stand, one more once, in the record section of the library as it was in the mid-seventies and, systematically and unhurriedly, go through the racks, committing every cover, every tracklist, every essay by Brian Rust and whoever else to memory.

So why didn't I drink deeper at the time? Maybe it wasn't just those other musical distractions. The library's jazz collection never seemed to be added to or whittled down, or not so's you'd notice. Did I assume it would be there forever? The few remaining jazzers from the old days weren't going to be making many more albums, after all, so there was no urgent need to probe every nook and cranny of this sleepy, PVC-girt collection. Miles Kington once wrote about "the kind of book which you put aside until tomorrow, when you'll be more alert", or words to that effect, and perhaps that's what I thought I was doing: postponing until I was ready. No one rushes to take their nasty medicine, despite its widely-attested benefits.

And I didn't have a guide. None of my brothers was interested in jazz, and I didn't see that post office assistant again. A few years ago on Radio 3 Duke Ellington was Donald Macleod's Composer of the Week; I was fascinated as he talked through each early side, singling out musicians and telling us what to listen for. There was an overlap with the approach of Luis Russell, and I couldn't understand why I'd waited several decades to discover this.

Maybe now, with this delightful tome by my side, I shall explore a little further.



Occasionally a direct CD equivalent of one of those old library albums crops up. I hesitated for a long time before deciding which Ivie Anderson CD to buy. A collection remastered by John R.T. Davies was undoubtedly the more sensible option, with its guarantee of good sound. But a CD reproducing the warm pink cover I remembered from an LP in the library, Duke Ellington Presents Ivie Anderson, called to me, even though online reviews suggested the sound of at least one CD edition was poor.

I think in the end I went for the CD with the Davies transfers. Yes: I think I did. But I can't easily convey how pleasurable the prospect was of holding a facsimile of that crudely designed original album cover. It wouldn't have brought back the past - the image would have been shrunken and mean by comparison with the twelve by twelve original, for a kickoff.


But, ridiculous as it may sound, I can't help thinking that receiving such a package, opening it and gazing upon the images of Ellington and Ivie Anderson on the front cover, looking for all the world like photos torn from a scrapbook, would have been a kind of holy act, or an act of reclamation: the thought of that background warms me now as it warmed me then, glowing through the cloudy yellow of its PVC cover.

There may be less noisy transfers of There's a Lull in My Life to be found on youtube at the present moment but I hope you will understand why this has to be the one embedded here:





13 July 2019

14 Karat Soul in 1980


Have just noticed that some videos of 14 Karat  Soul have been uploaded to youtube recently. I have written at length about the group here and elsewhere: seeing them in the mid-eighties at a week-long residency at Glasgow's Mitchell Theatre remains one of the most thrilling concert experiences I have ever had and I curse myself for not making a surreptitious recording during one of the several nights I attended. Whether there exists a high quality recording of their live act I know not; but there are odd bits and pieces on youtube: a BBC radio session here, a Channel 4 appearance there, and so on.

And now there are a few videos of their early days. Here is Carry Me Back from the show Sister Suzie Cinema - this live recording must be from 1980 as it was made the week before the premiere of the show in New York. Glenny T (I presume; it's hard to be certain) introduces Bobby Wilson, who delivers a stunning lead. Despite the low quality of sound and vision this is a treat. Reginald "Briz" Brisbon comes through loud and clear, driving the group along.



The lineup of that time is given on the Mabou Mines website as David S. Thurmond, Glen (Glenny T) Wright, Russell Fox 2d, Bobby S. Wilson and Reginold (Briz) Brisbon, so this must have been before Brian "Lamont" Simpson was recruited. The image at the top of this post also comes from that site.

I can't now remember whether he was in the production of Sister Suzie Cinema and The Gospel at Colonus which I saw in Edinburgh a year or two afterwards but he was definitely in the group at the time of the Mitchell Theatre, putting his everything into Annie Had a Baby and other songs.

I will return to this post over the next few days to add more videos. It's not quite my dream of coming across a high quality tape of their complete live repertoire of the time but it reminds me of that excitement which is almost forty years old now. 


Related posts:

14 Karat Soul 
14 Karat Soul live on Channel 4
14 Karat Soul as they should be heard
The first and last picture show: Sister Suzie Cinema on Soundcloud  
Try Them One More Time


7 July 2019

G-Clefs biography


It has to be said at the outset that this is not, in the technical sense, a well written book: there are  grammatical errors and infelicities which meaning you occasionally have to rewrite a sentence in your head to make sense of it - and don't get me started on the apostrophes. Was there really no one to cast an incisive eye over musician Mike Devlin's MS before it was shared with the world?

That said, this is still a compelling tale: stick with it and you will learn to filter out the blemishes, like tuning out the bacon sizzle on a 78 once the music grabs hold. And it is liberally illustrated with photographs of the group in action and posters and flyers for gigs.

The story begins some time before Devlin's fateful meeting with the group who would involve and expasperate him over a ten year period. Playing guitar as a young man to supplement his meagre wages as a computer operator he is approached, somewhat to his surprise, to join several bands led by showmen of varying abilities. He learns his craft from these and others along the way before a performance at a birthday bash leads to the momentous meeting with the G-Clefs and an invitation to perform regularly with the group, famous for such hits as I Understand (a favourite of Clarke Davis's) and Ka-Ding-Dong.

The story is then set out more or less gig by gig, spaced out over those ten years. This is the point at which some biographies can become a bit repetitive, but not so here. Provided you have gotten over those surface errors you will find yourself drawn into what is undoubtedly a warts-and-all account: individual members of the G-Clefs make stupid, seemingly irrational, decisions, passing up rare chances to advance their careers, or fall out, get drunk and collapse in a pool of blood while the rest of the group do their best to carry on.

The way he tells it, the eventual sundering between Mike and the G-Clefs doesn't seem to have been handled with particular grace by the group, especially after such a long working relationship, but you don't get the sense that this narrative is about settling scores. Some years later he is invited to a surprise seventieth birthday party of one of the group members, which he accepts. His summing up of the experience is enough to provide a taste of his writing style - you know what he means, more or less, though it's not quite what he's actually saying:

There was none of that reminiscing about our time together, but that was okay with me. Besides, I didn't think we would get through any part of our previous journey as we struggled to become one in unison with a shared common goal; to make the best music we could.
It wouldn't matter so much, I suppose, zipping by in conversation, but it shows up on the printed page. Unless that's just me.

The hard copy of this book also contains a "Special Added Feature" entitled "Doo-Wop and The G-Clefs: In Their Own Words". I haven't read this yet, but from a cursory glance it looks as though someone has actually subedited this: there don't seem to be the errors found in the main text (though both pieces are credited to Devlin). As I say, however, the eye and the mind adjust, and I would still recommend the book overall, but - a bit like those chances the group allow to pass them by - it's hard to understand why those extra steps weren't taken to make the text that bit more accessible.

These two tales - the bandleader's and the vocal group's - can be bought as separate ebooks but it feels right that they are between the same covers in the book proper. I don't yet know whether "In Their Own Words" will contain any startling revelations absent from the other side's account but there is a definite sense in the latter that however close Devlin gets to the G-Clefs through rehearsing and playing these many gigs they remain forever, in some essential way, closed off to him. When, for example, he is told that someone has been excluded from the group for a year, or that they have turned down a potential Vegas gig, it is not presented as something up for possible negotiation. The implication is: they have spoken, and they share a past whose significance no outsider can hope to understand.

Seeing that demarcation line is fascinating. It takes me back to that remark of Ben E King's quoted in Gerri Hershey's Nowhere to Run. Trying to explain the supreme importance of his streetcorner singing days King says: "Those guys knew when you were gonna breathe." How can a newcomer compete with three decades or more of that kind of closeness?

Yet there is contradictory behaviour. At one point Devlin is deeply hurt when a member of his band tells him that one of the singers commented that two of his musicians (Devlin himself seems to be excluded) couldn't play the music properly because they were white. When, at the next formal meeting between group and musicians, Devlin directly asks the group member whether he has any issues with any members of the band he says, head down, "No, I don't", and that is the end of that. During the same meeting, however, Devlin learns that the G-Clefs have turned down two potentially lucrative gigs in London (could this have been one of the Capitol Gold rock'n'roll shows?) and Philadelphia because the promoters only wanted them, not the band - which suggests loyalty and respect for their regular musicians' contribution (unless it was simply fear of the unknown).

During that surprise birthday party referred to earlier for the first time someone in the G-Clefs' camp admits to Mike that the group treated him badly but he is able to be magnanimous:
I reminded myself that it's not what they did to me; it's what they did to themselves.
There are several clips on youtube of the G-Clefs performing live during the timeframe of this book. Like the book they sure ain't smooth (unlike some of their earlier studio recordings) but it's easy to see that they must have been thrilling to watch live, whatever the ragged edges. They weren't gigging every night - Devlin makes the point that together they only did 42 shows over ten years - so was the group's decision to turn down Vegas about fears of the discipline involved? Was it simply that over long years they knew their limitations?

Anyway, here is their version of Can't Do Sixty No More.




DOO-WOP! and THE G-CLEFS: The saga of America's last original Doo-Wop group from the 1950s still performing by Michael G Devlin can be bought at amazon, Barnes and Noble, and possibly elsewhere. There does not seem to be a dedicated website.

Statcounter