In a major blow to local shoppers and the high street, the doors to a popular branch of a bargain stationery chain have closed for the last time. Danish chain Flying Tiger Copenhagen has been based in Croydon's largest shopping centre, Whitgift Centre, for at least seven years, but its store is now labelled as "permanently closed" on Google Maps and signage reading "Goodbye Croydon" is now visible on the shopfront.
[Daily Express, 28 April 2026]
As far as I'm aware there are still a fair number of Tiger shops operating in the UK though a North London branch which I used to frequent suffered the same fate as its Croydon counterpart some time earlier. A press report a few months ago stated that the Flying Tiger company was on the brink of being taken over by the same private equity firm which acquired and rebranded WH Smith as TG Jones; as 150 of the Smith/Jones shops are currently at risk of closure that does not seem to bode well for the company's other acquisitions.
According to the Extra London News website, the sudden vacancy in the Whitgift Centre is not entirely unexpected, with 73 empty units reported last October:
This trend aligns with national patterns in UK high-street retail, where economic pressures, high business rates, and the post-pandemic e-commerce boom have forced closures.
Why, you may ask, does it matter in the case of Tiger in particular? Aren't there other sources of cheap stationery and the sort of impulse purchases which you have cause to regret later (albeit not too much, given the modest outlay)? The answer is no, or rather there is one item of stationery which cannot be found these days without some difficulty.
For some reason it has become harder and harder to get hold of the kind of A5 notebook I favour: unlined with thin sewn-in pages. WH Smith (as was) used to stock a good 'un, also available in A4, but these days unlined notebooks in discount stores tend to be aimed at budding artists, with the sort of heavy paper which may well stop pages curling in reaction to a wet watercolour brush but which also cuts down on the number capable of fitting between its hard covers ... Oh yes, you need hard covers too, so you're not dependent on a task or table when the muse strikes.)
You don't really want thick, acid-free pages to scribble your ideas onto; what you want is something more substantial than tissue paper, though not too much, and lots of it, so that the firstlings of your mind can roam free over the snowy fields, with ample space to allow for the possibility of transforming into something else along the way. I love the freedom of those cheap and plentiful virgin pages: no need to worry that some half-formed observation is already using up most of the precious space and the revised version must remain, for the moment, trapped within your brainbox.
Is there, perhaps, some reason for the scarcity of such desirable objects which I've overlooked? Could it be that more recent generations become so accustomed to drafting direct to screen that they have drastically reduced the market for the humble product which has suited me, and perhaps others, so well?
Yes, there are Moleskine notebooks, but they are expensive without being expansive. And with space only to provide the barest outline of an idea in such a dainty product it's next door to keeping it all stored up in your head, risking the agonies described in Vladimir Nabokov's Pale Fire: an ever-tightening metal contraption around the cranium, if I recall aright.
Not that I am exactly in crisis mode. Over the years, I have been - no, not panic buying, but when I have found suitable items on the shelves of stationery shops I haven't trusted to their forever being in plentiful supply. I can't remember whether the shop was called Scribbler or Paperchase but I did buy up a lot of A5 notebooks from the Covent Garden branch of one or the other when it seemed that they were being discontinued; I still have a few as yet unmarked which I can produce upon application, though they are starting to become a little discoloured with age. As for the others, I could weep for the time and effort I lavished on them, the projects never quite followed through, but each time I buy another notebook it seems like a fresh start and I can put thoughts of past failures aside - for a while, anyway.
This isn't the first time I have written of a Tiger shop in this blog, though during my first encounter with this chain - the North London branch alluded to above - enticing as the products were it was the background music which piqued my curiosity. So come back with me, if you will, to the 28th of January, 2013:
Brighten the Corner ...
Had a small but pleasing moment today which I want to share.
After I had lunch at the local shopping centre (ooh, classy) in the area of North London where I work I had a few minutes before I had to return to business. "What's it to be?" I thought to myself. "A mooch in HMV?" But as I a) couldn't remember whether it was still open, and b) couldn't imagine finding much of interest there anyway, I went instead into the shop known as Tiger, really just to waste some time.
If you don't know about this chain, Tiger is full of lots of little things which contain the promise of creativity, though in my case it's rarely followed through, as though on some level I've tricked myself into believing the act of acquisition is enough in itself: sad to report my flat is full of such empty promises.
Today I saw cheapo acrylic paints and brushes, little canvases and drawing pads, and idly thought of buying some, maybe actually painting the image which appears at the top of this blog, which might reduce the need to be tinkering with it all the time.
In the end I didn't buy any painting materials, although I did pick up a small notebook, more as a kind of distant nod to the possibility of doing some "real" writing, as opposed to wasting my time more or less agreeably online, than out of any firm conviction that I would do so, that this - at last - was Day One of the rest of my life.
But that's not what I want to write about. As I was shopping, or browsing, Dion's Runaround Sue was playing and, not having heard it for a time, I was vaguely nodding along, happy to be hearing something other than the music which I couldn't recognise, and which wasn't for me, irritating my ears in the cafe where I had lately dined.
But then - get this - Dion having whooped his way to the fade, on came Paul Foster introducing the Soul Stirrers' Jesus Done Just What He Said, one of the songs recorded on Sam Cooke's very first Specialty session with the group in 1951 in glorious acapella. So whatever collection was playing wasn't just another identikit 50s collection. When I went to pay for the notebook, I eagerly asked the assistant who had compiled the playlist. She said it was random.
Oh.
I felt disappointed, having hoped to be told it was a company compilation or, ideally, to have someone pointed out to whom I could speak about the respective merits of Sam Cooke and Dion, on and on, as the sky, unnoticed outside, grew darker and it wouldn't matter.
But that wasn't going to happen.
Anyway, I felt impelled to tell her, as I was moving away, it brightened my day. Though I suppose if I had taken the time to be more of a smart*rse I could have said that it brightened the corner where I was, thinking about an Anthony Heilbut gospel compilation I own - which, as it happened, had an even earlier Soul Stirrers recording, from the days of RH Harris, the veteran of the circuit whom the young Cooke replaced.
I don't suppose it counts for all that much in the general scheme of things, but the unexpectedness of that conjunction: DiMucci and Cooke (or doo wop and gospel or Italian American and African American or any other other contrasts I may have missed) was a small but happy moment.
In Three Sisters, Chebutykin, the dopey doctor whose pockets are full of newspaper clippings (apparently there was an element of self-parody there) notes that Balzac was married in Berdichev. It may be that it's just a totally pointless bit of trivia seized on by the good doc but at least one critic has suggested that the doctor notes it because it suggests happiness is possible anywhere.
And for a moment in a North London shopping centre I felt more alive. I suppose because it never occured to me that anyone near where I live would be interested in those recordings - and maybe they weren't. But some process of selection must have been involved even to get the Soul Stirrers on random.
Three days later I returned to the shop:
Tiger, Tiger or Let the newt see the steam train
Ah, I know what I did now. Tried for too much in the same day. Like Icarus. Or Bruce's Big Night Out.
Going out for lunch today, before breaking away from the confines of Shopping City (ooh, adventurous), I went into that gift-shop-cum-art-materials store Tiger again, to see what musical pairing might surprise and delight me today.
And I wasn't disappointed: Mystery Train, and what sounded like a Ray Davies demo or early Kinks song called So Long. And what with the train taking Elvis's baby, and Ray bidding farewell - they sort of went together. Ish. I won't bother embedding Mystery Train as you can find it on a recent post about Junior Parker here, but this is So Long - as I now know, from the album Kinda Kinks:
And the point is you wouldn't expect to hear either in the shopping mall. Reminded me of another sort-of pairing on a Friday or Saturday night Radio 1 programme called, I think, The Friday or Saturday Sequence: Them's version of Baby Please Don't Go, followed by Bobby Charles' See You Later Alligator.
Anyway, I goes off for my unnecessary lunch (really an excuse to be away from work for a bit; I have adequate provisions there), am forced to explain the concept of lemon tea, etc, in the cafe I chose (and I have to endure horrible music, audible through the earplugs I habitually wear in such situations) and on the way back I think: I know, I'll go into Tiger again. Anything can happen, musically speaking, in the next six minutes.
There doesn't seem to be any sound for about half a minute, unless it was an exceptionally long fade to a track whose burden I have just missed, but then It's Only Love by the Beatles begins, with what sounds like real (ie imprecise and all the better for it) doubletracking. Maybe that was the album Lennon said they doubletracked the *rse off, or some such phrase. (No, you look it up.) And a woman near me is half-singing along, or just registering her pleasure in hearing this again, so it's a kind of tripletracking.
Oh boy, I think, and fall to wondering just what they (whoever "they" may be, given that I know the selection is random) will find to follow this. It'll have to be good.
To my surprise, and not really in a good way, it's the terminally unhip Sing, Sing, Sing by Benny Goodman - I'm sorry, but it just doesn't fit. It's before rock'n'roll and all the associated genres began. I leave the shop dejected, replacing, as I go, the notebook I had been planning to buy. Didn't fancy standing in a queue for two minutes to hear the track play itself out. Besides I bought a notebook last time. Still haven't used it.
Then, as I work back to work, I think about it. I'm desperate to create a narrative, some kind of order and meaning in the shunting together of those two songs. And in the five minute walk between Shopping Hell and my place of work, I get it. Or something, anyway.
In The Hours and the Times, or The Hours and the Days, or whatever - it's got Ian "Nowhere Boy" Hart in it, anyway - John Lennon finds a moment of communion with a air hostess when they dance to a lesser known Little Richard track, a cover of Fats Domino's I'm in Love Again. There had been some quite aggressive banter between them earlier - You're not playing your part, Dolly Bird." / "Nor you yours" - but when the Georgia Peach mumbles some nonsense at the start - not sure whether it's a genuinely live track or some bit of gimmickry - and Lennon/Hart begins a comical but unselfconscious rooster strut, in thrall to the man who, along with Elvis, showed him The Way, the air hostess succumbs. Not sure whether it's the prelude to a seduction, and it's a while since I saw the film, but if it is it's not calculated. They find themselves to be worshippers at the same shrine, that's all. And listening to Little Richard, Lennon is a fan, like her, not a star.
Now - and this is a bit of a stretch - might Sing, Sing, Sing have been Eppy's recording of choice had a similar opportunity ever presented itself?
Beat.
No? Oh, alright then.
Oh, actually it wasn't It's Only Love, was it, that was associated with Epstein but You've Got to Hide Your Love Away.
Just had a quick look at Revolution in the Head, which says "the lyric is the hollowest which Lennon ever perpetrated" and that the working title was That's a Nice Hat.
The only other thing I want to say in this post has nothing to do with my two forays to Tiger. I mention it simply because it appealed to me. It's a detail about Benjamin Britten I read in yesterday's Guardian. Apparently Britten used to compose in his head while walking in the countryside, and Chris Watson suggests that birdsong, and possibly other sounds, found their way into his work.
I felt certain Britten would reflect on the sounds around him while considering his compositions. It goes back to the idea that we hear everything – but don't really listen much. When we do take the trouble to listen, it's an engaging and creative process. I'm sure that's something Britten felt.But it's a non-musical moment which seems more important - at least it's saved for the end of the article, and although it's difficult to explain precisely why it matters, I have no doubt that it does.
Britten was a very private man. Had he taken his daily walk along the beach, or at Orford Ness nature reserve, he would have met lots of people. But there's one lovely encounter I was told of, when he walked down to the railway path and encountered two lads by the track. They had a jam-jar with a newt in it. He asked what they were up to and they said: "We're waiting for the two o'clock train to come out of Aldeburgh, so we can show this newt what a steam train looks like." They liked it – and thought the newt might, too.










































